Add Autofill Option to User Prompt Filters
Idea Logged
Hi Experts,
Would like to know if the below queries can be considered as an enhancement in future release:
1. When I manually start to type a word in a filter field in predefined report I would like to get automatic suggestions (e.g. I type 'ab' and I would expect suggestions ilke 'ab', 'abc', 'abcd' in a list below). Is there option like that?
2. I have built predefined report which is published for other users. </br>It has 2 predefined filters with type 'Contains', but it's not satisfying. </br>What I would like to achieve is to give possibility to user to choose by himself filter type (equal, like, contains etc). Is there such possibility?
Hi Amir,
Thanks for reaching out with your ideas and suggestions. Let me address each one-by-one - these will require separate Idea tickets.
1. The operand type's available to users will depend on the format of the field itself, but the option is there (the three dots next to the field name in filter list):
2. I definitely see the viability and usefulness of this one. We can change this ticket to an Idea item to track this one after clarifying #3.
3. I'm not quite sure how functionally this would be any different from having the corresponding field in a filter list to the left of the report - this would merely be another mechanism to add the filtered result to the WHERE clause. Can you possibly expand on why this would be particularly useful and why the existing functionality wouldn't suffice instead?
4. There is a pre-existing Idea ticket for this, which you can reference here. I've gone ahead and added you to the client list in our internal task of those interested in seeing this implemented.
I look forward to your feedback.
Regards,
Mike
Hi Amir,
Thanks for reaching out with your ideas and suggestions. Let me address each one-by-one - these will require separate Idea tickets.
1. The operand type's available to users will depend on the format of the field itself, but the option is there (the three dots next to the field name in filter list):
2. I definitely see the viability and usefulness of this one. We can change this ticket to an Idea item to track this one after clarifying #3.
3. I'm not quite sure how functionally this would be any different from having the corresponding field in a filter list to the left of the report - this would merely be another mechanism to add the filtered result to the WHERE clause. Can you possibly expand on why this would be particularly useful and why the existing functionality wouldn't suffice instead?
4. There is a pre-existing Idea ticket for this, which you can reference here. I've gone ahead and added you to the client list in our internal task of those interested in seeing this implemented.
I look forward to your feedback.
Regards,
Mike
Replies have been locked on this page!