New Topic

Community Topic Problem Administration

Sharwari Inkane

Yellowfin Support Team

Assigned

Category Administration

Product Version 9.0

Date filter periods - duplicate entry in german

Stefan Hall shared this problem ago

Defect Fixed

Hi,

i have freshly installed version 9.8.1.1 and confirmed the observation from 9.8.0.1. The entry "last quarter" is duplicated and I'm not sure whether

the translation is bad and it is two functions or
the entry is unnecessarily duplicated

Anyway, it is a defect. Happy to help

;) Stefan

3c20fb9aeb821e193cd72c09d579dc73

The same problem 0

Replies (5)

Sharwari Inkane ●

Hi Stefan,

Thanks for contacting the yellowfin support team,

I have also verified in both versions (9.8.1.1 and 9.8.0.1) and observed that the "Last Quarter" date filter period entry is duplicated.

As I can see in the Dev tasks, we have already logged Defect (YFN-24770) with the Dev team. Unfortunately, we do not have update on that, I have added your request as well into existing Jira Ticket. Updates to this task will be provided here as they are available.

Please feel free to respond here if you have any additional questions.

Regards,
Sharwari

Reply URL

Stefan Hall ●

Hi,
you have made changes in this area in the new version v9.9. Why don't you take the chance and fix these bugs at the same time?
;) Stefan

URL

Sharwari Inkane ●

Hello Stefan,

I hope you are doing well. We are chasing up with the product team to expedite this issue. If there are any further updates from the product team on this issue, we will keep you informed.

Regards,
Sharwari Inkane

Reply URL

Sharwari Inkane ●

Hi Stefan,

I hope you're doing well.

I wanted to update you regarding the issue you raised. The Product team has informed me that, for the time being, you can work around the problem by de-selecting one of the duplicate entries. At this point in time, the issue raised is currently under the visibility of the Product team and certainly team would be planning to address it in future releases, potentially in version 9.11.

If you have any further questions or concerns, please feel free to reach out.

Regards,

Sharwari Inkane

Reply URL

Sharwari Inkane ●

Hello Stefan,

Greetings for the day!

We have received an update from the development team that the issue is planned to be fixed in the future version 9.11. I will notify you when this version becomes available.

Once the fix is completed, we will certainly keep you updated on this page. If you have any questions, please feel free to revert back to the same thread, and we would be more than happy to assist you.

Regards,
Sharwari Inkane

Reply URL

Sharwari Inkane ●

Hello Stefan,

I hope all is well,

This is to keep you informed that, according to the dev team update I have, the issue that was previously planned to be fixed in the 9.11 release will now be addressed in the 9.12 version. I will notify you when this version becomes available. When the product team responds with any new information regarding the same, I'll keep you informed about it. Feel welcome to reply here with any related inquiries.

Regards,
Sharwari Inkane

Reply URL

Stefan Hall ●

Hi Sharwari,

Thank you for the information.

If the entry is really duplicated, i.e. the same designation with the same function, it is not a major defect. However, if only the name is the same but the functions behind it are different, the situation would be different.

But seriously, the adjustment on your side takes less time than writing your information and now it should take another 6 months. I don't understand this approach.

;) Stefan

URL

Sharwari Inkane ●

Hello Stefan,

I hope all is well,

Upon investigation, I have confirmed that the entry is indeed unnecessarily duplicated. Moreover, our product team has suggested a straightforward workaround: you can easily resolve this by deselecting one of the duplicate entries immediately, without having to wait for a comprehensive fix. Given this workaround, the product team doesn't deem it necessary to prioritize this issue at a high level. However, I want to assure you that our product team is already diligently working on a permanent solution to prevent such occurrences in the future.

Please let me know if you have any questions for concerns.

Regards,
Sharwari Inkane

URL

Jim Staples ●

Hello, I'm also seeing the "Last Quarter" displayed twice (english version 9.8). There is however a difference in predicates added to the query between the 2.

The first entry adds date range Jan 1, 2024 to March 31, 2024 (as expected)

The Second Entry adds date range Jan1, 2024 to March 30, 2024 (one day short of full quarter).

URL

Sharwari Inkane ●

Hello,

Happy Monday!

I'm pleased to inform you that the issue brought up in this ticket has been resolved in version 9.12, which will be available by the end of this month. As soon as the most recent version is out and the download link is up, I will notify you of the update.

Regards,
Sharwari Inkane

URL

Sharwari Inkane ●

Hello Stefan,

Greetings of the day!

We are pleased to inform you that the issue you reported in this ticket has been resolved in our latest release 9.12 version. You can access the release notes and downloads by visiting https://portal.yellowfinbi.com/public/releases/home.

As a result, we will now mark this ticket as "Defect fixed". Please reach out to us if you need any additional assistance we would be happy to assist you.

We value the customer experience and feedback and would like to understand your experience from our recent interaction. Your valuable feedback will help us serve you better in the future. Thank you for taking the time.

Regards,
Sharwari Inkane

URL

Jan.Zacharjasiewicz ●

Be aware that upgrading to the version 9.12.01 may cause a problem because of this defect "fix":

ff839826f4a68aebe9bc018f0c9a1a87

URL