Stacking columns within a section?
Answered
I would like to build a PDF compatible report similar to the format shown in the attached images. Can something like this be built in YF?
The values are strings usually one to three sentences long.
Formatting the report with columns causes problems with pdf export. Due to the lengthy nature of the cell values, and the limitations of paper, column widths restrict the total number of words per line. By stacking the columns I hope to increase column width.
I considered using a row formatted table, but I like the appearance of the stacked column report format more.
Thank you,
Dan
I get this. Really important. Specially in business intelligence systems Victoria stuff.
I get this. Really important. Specially in business intelligence systems Victoria stuff.
Hi Dan,
Thanks for getting in touch. I think that the only way to accomplish this will be to use a union sub query, in concert with two view level calculated fields to provide you with a field to section by.
So your calculated fields would simply return strings (This will give you something to place into sections):
X with eq: "X" (or first 3)
Y with eq "Y"
Here is my data preview tab:
Place fields 1-3 into the report, field X into the "sections", then create a union sub-query that joins on:
1=4
2=5
3=6
X=Y (sections require a join as well)
The result of this will be:
You will then need to re-name your columns appropriately.
Please let me know if this works for you.
Regards,
Nathan
Hi Dan,
Thanks for getting in touch. I think that the only way to accomplish this will be to use a union sub query, in concert with two view level calculated fields to provide you with a field to section by.
So your calculated fields would simply return strings (This will give you something to place into sections):
X with eq: "X" (or first 3)
Y with eq "Y"
Here is my data preview tab:
Place fields 1-3 into the report, field X into the "sections", then create a union sub-query that joins on:
1=4
2=5
3=6
X=Y (sections require a join as well)
The result of this will be:
You will then need to re-name your columns appropriately.
Please let me know if this works for you.
Regards,
Nathan
Hi Nathan,
As I feared, that was well outside what I currently understand how to accomplish with YF. Looks like I'm going to settle with a simple row based report.
Thanks anyway,
Dan
Hi Nathan,
As I feared, that was well outside what I currently understand how to accomplish with YF. Looks like I'm going to settle with a simple row based report.
Thanks anyway,
Dan
Hi Dan,
Im sorry I might have taken the word sections a little too seriously in that response, and tailored my suggestion around that. If your final goal is achieving this visually for export purposes, have you tried employing the co-display functionality? (you can place multiple reports in to the top and bottom co-display).
IRegards,
Nathan
Hi Dan,
Im sorry I might have taken the word sections a little too seriously in that response, and tailored my suggestion around that. If your final goal is achieving this visually for export purposes, have you tried employing the co-display functionality? (you can place multiple reports in to the top and bottom co-display).
IRegards,
Nathan
No I haven't, but that sounds intriguing. Could I accomplish a similar export result (formating shown in the chalk board photos) that way? Are their visual examples available, so I could compare?
No I haven't, but that sounds intriguing. Could I accomplish a similar export result (formating shown in the chalk board photos) that way? Are their visual examples available, so I could compare?
Hi Dan,
Here is a video on how to enable co-display and link your report's filters.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5toIXhiyCc
Essentially, columns A-C would be placed in the first report, while C-F would appear in the second report. This will allow you do display large amounts of columns in a sensible fashion, with a final result similar to the "sections" display.
Is this the effect you are going for here?
Regards,
Nathan
Hi Dan,
Here is a video on how to enable co-display and link your report's filters.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5toIXhiyCc
Essentially, columns A-C would be placed in the first report, while C-F would appear in the second report. This will allow you do display large amounts of columns in a sensible fashion, with a final result similar to the "sections" display.
Is this the effect you are going for here?
Regards,
Nathan
Hi Nathan,
Co-Display likely won't work as I currently understand it. The format is a similar effect, but only if 1 section is exported. The goal of this report is to export multiple sections simultaneously. Consider IMG_7115.JPG, there are two sections listed, the upper (columns a-c) and lower (columns c-f) rows are grouped per section. With co-display these upper and lower rows for each section would be separated when multiple sections are exported. For example the table order would be something like: section 1 upper, section 2 upper, section 1 lower, and section 2 lower. With more assets, that pattern would further seperate upper and lower information, and be difficult to follow. Is there a way to prevent separating the sections for the upper and lower rows with co-display?
Hi Nathan,
Co-Display likely won't work as I currently understand it. The format is a similar effect, but only if 1 section is exported. The goal of this report is to export multiple sections simultaneously. Consider IMG_7115.JPG, there are two sections listed, the upper (columns a-c) and lower (columns c-f) rows are grouped per section. With co-display these upper and lower rows for each section would be separated when multiple sections are exported. For example the table order would be something like: section 1 upper, section 2 upper, section 1 lower, and section 2 lower. With more assets, that pattern would further seperate upper and lower information, and be difficult to follow. Is there a way to prevent separating the sections for the upper and lower rows with co-display?
Hi Dan,
Would you be interested in scheduling a screen-share? If so please let me know what time works best for you. I am on United States mountain time.
Regards,
Nathan
Hi Dan,
Would you be interested in scheduling a screen-share? If so please let me know what time works best for you. I am on United States mountain time.
Regards,
Nathan
Hi Nathan,
Sure. I'm available now, or tomorrow at the same time.
Thanks,
Dan
Hi Nathan,
Sure. I'm available now, or tomorrow at the same time.
Thanks,
Dan
Hi Dan,
Now works for me. Just click the link below whenever you are ready:
https://meetings.ringcentral.com/j/1496565335
Nathan
Hi Dan,
Now works for me. Just click the link below whenever you are ready:
https://meetings.ringcentral.com/j/1496565335
Nathan
Hi Dan,
Per our discussion, I'm going to go ahead and close this ticket, but please let me know if you run into any other issues and the case will be re-opened.
Regards,
Nathan
Closed Request Survey.
Hi Dan,
Per our discussion, I'm going to go ahead and close this ticket, but please let me know if you run into any other issues and the case will be re-opened.
Regards,
Nathan
Closed Request Survey.
Replies have been locked on this page!