Question on grouping in custom functions
Answered
Hi,
I'm looking to add a custom function.
The function is technically an aggregation and should be grouped by other non aggregate fields in the query.
The function takes the form of
FUNCTION(field1, field2)
The plan is to allow the user to pick the fields. As you can see, field1 and field2 are not aggregated themselves so I was unsure whether I should add this to the definition?
<aggregate>$1</aggregate>
<aggregate>$2</aggregate>
If I do, will this group by the other non aggregate fields in the query as I need?
Thanks
Dean
Hi Dean,
Yes, if you want to aggregate the fields, you should add the relevant tags for that functionality in the definition. They won't appear in the GROUP BY clause, so it should do grouping by the other fields in your query.
Let me know how it goes.
Kind regards,
Chris
Hi Dean,
Yes, if you want to aggregate the fields, you should add the relevant tags for that functionality in the definition. They won't appear in the GROUP BY clause, so it should do grouping by the other fields in your query.
Let me know how it goes.
Kind regards,
Chris
Hi Dean,
Hope you're having a good week.
Just wanted to check-in and see how it's all going. Was there anything you were needing from me to help get this resolved?
Regards,
Chris
Hi Dean,
Hope you're having a good week.
Just wanted to check-in and see how it's all going. Was there anything you were needing from me to help get this resolved?
Regards,
Chris
Hi Chris,
Apologies, this one slipped my mind
Don't need anything else on this. We haven't added it yet but I'm happy enough with your answer
Thanks
Dean
Hi Chris,
Apologies, this one slipped my mind
Don't need anything else on this. We haven't added it yet but I'm happy enough with your answer
Thanks
Dean
Hi Dean,
No worries. I'll close this off for now. Enjoy your week!
Kind regards,
Chris
Hi Dean,
No worries. I'll close this off for now. Enjoy your week!
Kind regards,
Chris
Replies have been locked on this page!